{"id":389,"date":"2013-10-29T20:52:09","date_gmt":"2013-10-29T20:52:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/?p=389"},"modified":"2021-12-21T20:05:20","modified_gmt":"2021-12-21T20:05:20","slug":"virginia-do-insurer-obligated-to-defend-insureds-served-with-search-warrant-and-subpoena","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/virginia-do-insurer-obligated-to-defend-insureds-served-with-search-warrant-and-subpoena\/","title":{"rendered":"Virginia &#8211; D&#038;O insurer obligated to defend insureds served with search warrant and subpoena"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/Virginia.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/Virginia-300x300.jpg\" alt=\"Virginia\" width=\"300\" height=\"300\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-463\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/Virginia-300x300.jpg 300w, http:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/Virginia-150x150.jpg 150w, http:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/Virginia.jpg 325w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/attorneys.html?Attorney=Graham\">Christopher Graham<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/attorneys.html?Attorney=Kelly\">Joseph Kelly<\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>Protection Strategies, Inc. v. Starr<\/em>, Case No. 1:13-cv-00763 (E.D. Va. Sept. 10, 2013)<\/p>\n<p>Starr issued a &#8220;Resolute Portfolio for Private Companies&#8221; policy to Protection Strategies, Incorporated (&#8220;PSI&#8221;) which provided coverage for PSI and its officers.<\/p>\n<p>PSI received a February 1, 2012 search and seizure warrant and subpoena from the NASA Office of the Inspector General (&#8220;OIG&#8221;) and a June 2012 letter from U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia indicating that it was investigating PSI for civil liability related to PSI&#8217;s participation in the Small Business Administration Section 8(a) program.<\/p>\n<p>PSI retained counsel and submitted its counsel&#8217;s invoices to Starr. Starr refused to reimburse for defense costs stating &#8220;the NASA Subpoena [and] Search and Seizure Warrant &#8230; are not demands for relief or proceedings commenced by the service of a complaint or similar document,&#8221; and thus &#8220;there is no coverage or reimbursement available for the invoices submitted by Dickstein Shapiro as there is no Claim against PSI.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Starr&#8217;s policy defines &#8220;Claim&#8221; as:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>any &#8220;written demand for monetary, non-monetary, or injunctive relief<br \/>\n  made against an Insured&#8221; and any &#8220;judicial, administrative, or<br \/>\n  regulatory proceeding, whether civil or criminal, for monetary,<br \/>\n  non-monetary or injunctive relief commenced against an Insured &#8230; by<br \/>\n  (i) service of a complaint or similar pleading; (ii) return of an<br \/>\n  indictment, information, or similar document (in the case of a<br \/>\n  criminal proceeding); or (iii) receipt or filing of a notice of<br \/>\n  charges.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The court found Starr had a duty to defend PSI because:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;[t]he search warrant was a written order demanding non-monetary<br \/>\n  relief in the form of PSI&#8217;s obligation to turn over numerous files and<br \/>\n  records. Both the warrant and the subpoena were a result of legal<br \/>\n  proceedings that required a finding of probable cause, leaving no<br \/>\n  question that the government had identified PSI as a target for<br \/>\n  criminal and civil liability.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Tags: Virginia, D&amp;O, duty to defend, search warrant, subpoena<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Christopher Graham and Joseph Kelly Protection Strategies, Inc. v. Starr, Case No. 1:13-cv-00763 (E.D. Va. Sept. 10, 2013) Starr issued a &#8220;Resolute Portfolio for Private Companies&#8221; policy to Protection Strategies, Incorporated (&#8220;PSI&#8221;) which provided coverage for PSI and its officers. PSI received a February 1, 2012 search and seizure warrant and subpoena from the [&hellip;]<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/389"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=389"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/389\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3193,"href":"https:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/389\/revisions\/3193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joneslemongraham.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}